Tips for Grant Writing
Success
ASTDD Annual Meeting
Fort Worth, Texas, April 27, 2014
Bev Isman, RDH, MPH, ELS
Kathleen Mangskau, RDH, MPA
Objectives
Provide tips for the grant sections that states
find most challenging as well as grant
writing success factors.
Promote reflection on how programs can
use health agency and community resources
to enhance their grant writing process.
SOHP Key Frustrations
Needs/ projects don’t match funder priorities
Understanding/following FOA guidance
Short submission deadlines
Limited SOHP staffing and grantwriting expertise
How/when to best involve stakeholders
Lack of data to support needs
Aligning objectives, activities, evaluation and budget
Identifying non-federal match
Navigating online application/tracking process
Rejection/approval notices with no feedback
Some SOHP Keys to Success
Highlighting/following FOA guidance
Good partnership support; ability to leverage other
resources
Good data to support needs/gaps
Supervisor/state leadership support
Appropriate grantwriting expertise/support
Ability to tell our story
Good evaluation plan
Abstract or summary
Organizational
description
Identification of needs
(needs assessment)
Project description
Service
area/populations
served
Project goals and
objectives
Work plan
Staffing
Partnerships
Budget/Justification
Project accountability
Evaluation plan
Project
outcomes/impact
How you will share
project information
Key Sections of a Grant
Why Grants?
1) You receive funds because
you meet needs,
not because you have needs.
2) Grants may not be the best way
to meet the needs
3) A partner may be the best applicant for
your project
Grant Reviews
In person vs conference calls
One subject area (oral health) vs many
(public health)
Funder staff vs outside reviewers
Stakeholders vs content experts
Researchers vs program/PH expertise
Professional and personal biases
Other factors: geographical balance, special
populations, rural vs urban, etc.
Potential Funding
Sources for Oral Health
Federal agencies
National organizations
Foundations
State Appropriations
Special Funds
Not-for-Profit Groups
Service Clubs
Private Corporations
Businesses
Where to Look For Funding Sources
Print directories
On-line databases
Libraries
Constituents
Elected officials
Similar agencies
Prior funders
Conduct a Funder Analysis
“About Us,” Mission, Giving history, Annual
reports
Products and services/types of grants
Funding cycles FOA vs continual
Matching funds requirement
Eligibility preferences/restrictions
Investor relation/corporate information
Fit for department and program priorities,
alignment, framework and strategic plan
Grant Skills
Create business/funding plan
Build/use partnerships
Assess/reflect community needs
Develop/follow workplans and
evaluation plans
Writing, integrating comments
and edits, proofing
Data analysis and presentation
Negotiation, diplomacy, collaboration
Grant Writing/Management
Use partnerships; build on the strength of
collective impact
Build on lessons learned; review past
successful and unsuccessful grants (yours or
others)
Ask for critical review from mentors or
others
Make sure you have the right expertise at
the table as well as a good writer
Using an Outside Grantwriter
They don’t know your program, you do! They are
not mindreaders or magicians.
Grantwriters’ skills and styles may be very
different; you need to find the right match.
Grantwriters are best at helping you get organized,
reviewing and “cleaning up” what you’ve written,
and making sure you are ready to submit.
What you really need on the team is a stellar
writer who can adapt for different audiences!
Getting Organized
One person cannot do it alone!
Develop funding plan, prioritize , match to
potential funders
Get community/partner input on needs/priorities
and resources to leverage, including matching $
Write and get feedback on standard paragraphs for
organizational description, needs assessment,
service areas/populations served, staffing , and
potential projects, plus collect CVs/bios in a file
Mobilize Partnerships
Partner to conceptualize, write, implement, evaluate the
grant
Staff - epi, evaluator, program managers
Supervisor support
State leadership support
Chronic disease, MCH, other state programs
Medicaid/CHIP
Oral Health Coalition
FQHCs/CHCs
Foundation coordination
Universities
Describe Partnerships
Identify key partnerships and other
resources
Describe their commitment to the project
Identify gaps in partnerships and how you
will fill them
Identify new partnerships you are building
Make sure letters of support state specific
commitments or type of support
FOA Team Effort
Read it, Read it and Reread it!
Determine if you are an eligible applicant
Highlight or underline key dates, requirements and
questions to answer
Make a checklist of all items that need to be included in
the submission and how to submit them
Note any areas of confusion; clarify with funder
Check off the items in the checklist when you submit the
application
Track via email notifications or other means
Foibles of FOAs
Boilerplate language can be confusing, vague, and
not match subject specific definitions
Some instructions in the guidance may be
contradictory or not supported by the online
submission framework (e.g., forms that aren’t
fillable, no place to attach a file)
Grants.gov and other systems make minor
changes, e.g., password requirements, or are
incompatible with browsers
Timelines
Set a timeline for completing each section of the
application and the forms/assurances
If multiple writers, assign the sections and set
deadlines, then have one person edit into one style
Allow adequate time for accounting/budget review
Allow adequate time for review and edits by
supervisors/agency officials
Have one person proof the final document
Submit 1-2 days before the deadline to
allow for unanticipated glitches
Organizing the Narrative
Use the Section Headings from the FOA guidance
so it is easy for reviewers to find the information
Integrate strong reliable data from various sources
to support the need and identify data gaps
Write a compelling story so non-dental reviewers
will understand what the needs are, why they are
important and how you propose to address them
Where Do I Get the Data?
Use local data if possible; Use comparisons
State Plan
BRFSS
YRBS
PRAMS
Cancer Registry
ASTDD State
Synopsis
NOHSS
State Medicaid/CHIP
State epidemiologist
Dental insurers
CHC Clinical Data
PCA infrastructure
and clinical data
Universities, policy
institutes
State and local surveys
Other grants
Creating Your Work Plan
Use their forms if required
Use a well-organized form/table format
(build the ladder)
Goals
Objectives
Activities and Strategies
Time frame
Party responsible
Evaluation
Work Plan Template
Develop Quantifiable Objectives to
Facilitate Evaluation
SMART objectives are measurable
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Realistic
Time bound
By June 30, 2014 increase to 50 the percentage of pregnant
women in state X who received preventive oral health care
in the last 12 months. (Baseline: 45% in 2011, PRAMS)
Use Quantifiable Measures for
Activities
Assess oral health policies in all schools in
County X
Evaluation Measure:
# of schools with comprehensive policy
# of schools with policy that is not comprehensive
# of schools with no policy
(the total of these three measures should equal the
total number of schools in the county)
Build the Ladder
Goal: Improve access to dental care for underserved
children.
Objective: By July 2014, increase to 40 the percentage of
Medicaid enrolled children age 0-21who have had a
preventive dental visit in the last 12 months. (Baseline:
35% in 2012, CMS 416)
Strategy: Implement dental sealant programs in schools.
Activity: Implement dental sealant programs in all (10)
elementary schools in Laurel County with >50% of their
children enrolled in free/reduced fee school
lunch programs.
Matching Exercise
Evaluation/performance measures are
matched to objectives and activities
Items in the work plan that require funding
are included in the budget (if not included,
indicate if there is another funding source)
Staffing level of effort can accomplish and
evaluate activities
Measuring Success/Evaluation
Process Examples
# of communities
served
# of children reached
# of children receiving
dental sealants
Workshops conducted
and evaluated
State plan developed
Examples of Outcomes
Increase in the % of
children with dental
sealants
Decrease in the % of
children with untreated
caries
Clinics use best practices
to improve their no-show
rates
Assuring Progress
and Accountability
Are we meeting timelines for completion of
activities and strategies?
If not, what hindered performance?
Did we do what we said we were going to do?
If not, what hindered performance?
Did partnerships result in more coordinated efforts
and leveraged resources?
What lessons were learned and what successes
should we celebrate and share?
Are we on track with spending?
Sharing Results
Decide on target audiences and plan specific
communications
Newsletters
Annual reports
E-mail blasts
Websites and social networking sites--Twitter, Facebook
Press releases
Presentations
“Funders entice other funders”
“Communication maintains your visibility and acknowledges
the contribution of partners”